The panel’s Republican chief is rebuked by one Democrat for claiming a New Hampshire election was probably rigged. Another questions the panel’s objectivity.
Ahead of a meeting in New Hampshire, a member of the panel called it “highly likely” that the state’s Senate race was decided with bogus votes. Outrage ensues.
By a 2-to-1 vote, a three-judge panel reinstated an order that allowing those without an accepted ID to vote by signing a declaration stating they have a reasonable impediment to obtaining one.
A Times investigation has found that infiltration efforts were broader than previously disclosed and that state and federal agencies have conducted few forensic inquiries.
The 2011 law requiring photo IDs for voting was struck down even after it was revised in response to legal challenges.