“Agreeing to a deal that constrains the BOJ policy or foreign-exchange rate could be seen as a major concession on Japan’s sovereignty for the benefit of the U.S.,” the note said. “Allowing the yen to strengthen and causing the BOJ to tighten policy undermines Japan’s reflation efforts.”
More to the point: “If the Trump administration still insists on a tough currency deal, which is not our main scenario, we believe Abe is more likely to confront than concede,” the note said.
That doesn’t mean that Abe will put nothing on the table, however.
Japan was preparing a package that it said could generate hundreds of thousands of jobs in the U.S., according to government sources familiar with the plans, Reuters reported last week.
The plan was expected to include investments in infrastructure projects, including high-speed railways, the report said. It wasn’t clear how long these plans have been in the works as Japan Inc. has been seeking overseas infrastructure investments for many years.
Other analysts don’t expect Abe to bring too much of a package to the meeting.
“We think it could also be difficult for the Abe administration, which has thus far tried to promote more active domestic investment as part of its growth strategies, to shift gears and push Japanese companies to make further inroads into U.S. business,” Nomura said in a note last week.
The bank said it expected the Japanese government was likely most concerned with avoiding being saddled with protectionist demands at the summit.
“A particularly troubling scenario would be one in which Japan faces strong pressure to reduce its trade surplus with the U.S., while the BOJ’s monetary policy is simultaneously sharply criticized as being designed to devalue the yen,” it said.
But Nomura added that it saw little that Japan could realistically do to reduce its trade surplus.
It noted that while the Trump administration appeared to be particularly targeting autos. While autos are a key Japanese export to the U.S., few U.S.-made cars are sold in Japan.
While that may make for headlines that appeal to protectionist sentiment in the U.S., Nomura noted that Japan has already reduced tariffs on U.S. auto imports to zero.
To be sure, at least one analyst believes Japan’s monetary policy should be considered currency manipulation.
“In our view, the accusation is essentially valid,” Takuji Okubo, chief economist at Japan Macro Advisors, said in a note last week.
“Japanese policy makers have been guiding, if not manipulating, the yen lower in the last four years.”
Okubo noted that taking measures to tamp down the yen was one of Abe’s campaign promises in 2012.
“While it is true that Japan has not directly intervened in the foreign exchange rate market, Japanese government officials clearly prefer weaker yen, say so explicitly from time to time and they have taken measures they know would influence the yen to weaken,” he said.
Okubo noted that the BOJ’s policy to weaken the yen was defensible back in 2012, when the yen was at nosebleed levels of a mere 80 to the U.S. dollar, but he added that continuing to guide the yen lower looked like a “beggar thy neighbour” currency policy to make Japan’s exports more attractive.
“In our view, the Trump administration is quite canny to set its eyes on the yen. The threat to put an upward pressure on yen will prove to be a valuable bargaining chip to force Japan to open its domestic market to U.S. exports, such as agricultural products and service sectors,” he said.
—By CNBC.Com’s Leslie Shaffer; Follow her on Twitter @LeslieShaffer1