How ACA, AHCA and BCRA compare

The Better Care Reconciliation Act, like the American Health Care Act, radically revises Medicaid, but it is closer to the Affordable Care Act on how it approaches subsidies to buy individual insurance. Both the House and Senate bills eliminate taxes that paid the costs to cover more people through Medicaid and to subsidize individual plans.

Some of the big differences between current law, the House bill and the Senate bill are:

Current​ law: Enhanced federal match for expansion population is 95% this year, 94% next year, 93% in 2019 and 90% in 2020 and beyond

AHCA: Enhanced match for expansion population maintained as described in ACA until 2020, when those who were still on receive enhanced match until they cycle out of the program.

BCRA: 90% match in 2020; 85% in 2021; 80% in 2022; 75% in 2023. No grandfathering. After 2023, federal contribution is based on general state match percentage.

Current​ law: States design benefit packages, provider reimbursement levels and eligibility, within federal parameters, and the federal government’s match rate varies depending on the wealth of the state, ranging from 50% to 73%.

AHCA: Starting in 2020, the federal contribution would be a dollar figure for various groups within Medicaid, which would only be allowed to grow by either medical inflation or medical inflation plus 1 percentage point. The aged and disabled adults would be under the more generous per capita cap. Each state’s base figure would be based on historic per enrollee spending.

BCRA: Starting in 2020, the House version of the per capita cap would take effect, excluding children who are on disability. Instead, they would be under the old match. Starting in 2025, the per capita cap would grow at standard inflation, which is substantially lower than medical inflation. States would have more flexibility on how to set the base rate.

The HHS secretary would be required to even out the base rates for states by increasing low-spending states’ contributions by at least 0.5% but not more than 2%. The secretary would also be required to penalize states that spend 25% or more above the average spending limit, within the same parameters. However, “low density states,” which are Alaska, the Dakotas, Montana and Wyoming, would be exempt. Current per enrollee spending for seniors, for example, has 21 states that spend at least 25% above the national average, including those five, but also near the top are Connecticut, Delaware, Indiana and New Mexico.

Cost-sharing-reductions:

Current​ law: Continue to be paid to insurers.

AHCA: Paid in 2019 and 2020 only.

BCRA: Paid in 2019 and 2020 only.

Current​ law: Available for individuals or families that earn between 138% and 400% of poverty, as long as they don’t have access to affordable plans through an employer or other source. Are based on age, income and local cost of insurance.

AHCA: Available for everyone, as long as they don’t have access to affordable plans through an employer or other source. Are age-based only, and more generous than current law to younger customers.

BCRA: Available to those below 350% of poverty, solving the glitch that occurred in non-expansion states. Based on age, income and local cost of insurance, but the sliding scale is less generous for those age 50 and older, starting at 200% of poverty. Those near the top of the subsidy eligibility who are 60 years old could only receive a subsidy if the plan costs more than 16% of annual income. Subsidies are geared to a plan with an actuarial value of 58%, just below a bronze-level plan. The current subsidies are tied to the silver plans, which cover 70% of costs for most customers.

Current​ law: 10 essential health benefits are required in all insurance, including prescription drugs, maternity care and mental health care. Plans have to sell to everyone, and cannot charge sick people more.

AHCA: States may apply for waivers to drop essential benefits or the rules on charging sick people more, but those changes only apply to those who did not maintain continuous coverage.

BCRA: States may apply for waivers to essential benefits, but not for rejecting sick applicants or charging them more.

Current​ law: Everyone is supposed to buy insurance or face a tax penalty. Companies with at least 50 employers are required to offer insurance.

AHCA: Those who don’t buy insurance can be charged 30% more per month for one year when they try to come back in. No employer mandate.

BCRA: No mandate.

Current​ law: Insurers, hospitals, medical-device manufacturers, rich employer-based plans and investment income, among others, were tapped to pay for the expansion. Some of those taxes, especially the Cadillac tax on rich employer plans, were so unpopular they were never implemented. The investment income tax is the biggest funder.

AHCA: The taxes are repealed, though not all immediately.

BCRA: The taxes are repealed, some retroactively, such as the investment tax, and some in 2018 and 2023. The Cadillac tax is temporarily repealed, but returns in 2026.